Skip to content
BotServBotServ
Text ModelsLlamaMistralQwenGemmaComparison

Text Models Compared

Compare text models for local AI: Llama, Mistral, Qwen, Gemma, DeepSeek. Find the right model for your needs.

S

schutzgeist

4 min read
Text Models Compared

Text Models Compared

What This Article Covers

  • A practical comparison of the leading local text models.
  • Strengths and weaknesses of Llama, Mistral, Qwen, Gemma, and DeepSeek.
  • Which model fits which use case.
  • Hardware requirements and inference speed.
  • How to choose the right model for your needs.

Introduction: Text Models Explained

Text models are the workhorses of local AI. They generate text, answer questions, summarize, and translate. But they’re not all the same: some excel at German, others at code, and some at reasoning. This comparison helps you pick the right one.

Why Compare Text Models?

Dozens of text models exist. Without a clear comparison, you might pick one that’s slow, poor at German, or too large for your hardware. This article shows which model works best for each task.

Text Models at a Glance

The top models for local deployment: Llama 3.1/3.2 (Meta), Mistral (Mistral AI), Qwen 2.5 (Alibaba), Gemma 2 (Google), and DeepSeek. All run locally via Ollama. They differ in language quality, speed, tool calling, context length, and licensing.

The key principle: not the “best” model overall, but the best for your specific task.

Who Should Read This?

  • Beginners choosing their first model.
  • Intermediate users optimizing for specific tasks.
  • Developers who need tool calling.
  • Multilingual users working with German.

Key Concepts

  • Ollama - Model server. Use it to run models.
  • Quantization - Model compression. Use it to reduce VRAM.
  • Context Length - Maximum text length. Use it for long documents.
  • Function Calling - Tool use. Use it for agents.
  • Instruct - Instruction-tuned. Use it for chat and assistants.
  • Base - Untuned. Use it for fine-tuning.

The Big Five Compared

ModelCreatorSizesStrengthWeaknessBest For
Llama 3.1/3.2Meta1B-405BVersatile, excellent tool callingGerman is good, not top-tierGeneral purpose, agents
MistralMistral AI7B-123BEfficient, strong GermanLimited tool callingChat, efficient workloads
Qwen 2.5Alibaba0.5B-72BMultilingual, great tool callingLess well-knownMultilingual, coding
Gemma 2Google2B-27BEfficient, safeSmaller model rangeSimple tasks, edge devices
DeepSeekDeepSeek1.5B-236BReasoning, codingComplex licensingMath, programming

Detailed Breakdown

1. Llama 3.1 / 3.2 (Meta)

Strengths:

  • Best all-around model for local deployment
  • Excellent tool calling (critical for agents)
  • Large community with many fine-tuned variants
  • Llama 3.2: Compact models (1B, 3B) for edge devices

Weaknesses:

  • German quality is good but not exceptional
  • Larger versions demand significant VRAM

Recommendation: Use llama3.1:8b for most applications.

2. Mistral (Mistral AI)

Strengths:

  • Very efficient (fast with minimal VRAM)
  • Strong German output
  • Mistral Nemo: robust 12B model

Weaknesses:

  • Tool calling less mature than Llama
  • Fewer model options

Recommendation: Use mistral-nemo for chat and German text.

3. Qwen 2.5 (Alibaba)

Strengths:

  • Excellent multilingual support including German
  • Strong tool calling capabilities
  • Qwen 2.5-Coder: top-tier for programming

Weaknesses:

  • Less well-known, smaller community
  • Alibaba model (potential privacy concerns)

Recommendation: Use qwen2.5:14b for multilingual applications.

4. Gemma 2 (Google)

Strengths:

  • Very efficient (small, fast)
  • Good safety properties (resistant to jailbreaks)
  • 2B model suitable for edge and IoT

Weaknesses:

  • Smaller models have fewer capabilities
  • Fewer fine-tuned variants available

Recommendation: Use gemma2:2b for simple tasks, gemma2:9b for more complex work.

5. DeepSeek (DeepSeek)

Strengths:

  • Excellent for reasoning and math
  • DeepSeek-Coder: exceptional for programming
  • DeepSeek-R1: reasoning comparable to o1

Weaknesses:

  • Complex licensing model
  • Chinese model (privacy considerations apply)

Recommendation: Use deepseek-r1 for reasoning, deepseek-coder for code.

Model Size Comparison

SizeVRAM (Q4)SpeedQualityUse Case
1-3B2-3 GBVery fastBasicEdge, IoT, rapid testing
7-9B5-6 GBFastGoodStandard applications
12-14B8-10 GBModerateVery goodQuality-focused work
30-70B20-40 GBSlowExcellentProfessional workloads
100B+60+ GBVery slowMaximumServer-only deployments

German Language Quality

ModelGermanNotes
Mistral⭐⭐⭐⭐Excellent, European focus
Qwen 2.5⭐⭐⭐⭐Excellent, strong multilingual
Llama 3.1⭐⭐⭐Good, not exceptional
Gemma 2⭐⭐⭐Adequate
DeepSeek⭐⭐Leans toward English/Chinese

Tool Calling Capability

ModelTool CallingNotes
Llama 3.1⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐Best-in-class tool calling
Qwen 2.5⭐⭐⭐⭐Very strong
Mistral⭐⭐⭐Good
Gemma 2⭐⭐Limited
DeepSeek⭐⭐⭐Good for reasoning

Model Selection by Use Case

Use CaseRecommendedAlternative
General-purpose chatllama3.1:8bmistral-nemo
German textmistral-nemoqwen2.5:14b
Agents/toolsllama3.1:8bqwen2.5:14b
Multilingualqwen2.5:14bmistral-nemo
Reasoningdeepseek-r1qwen2.5:32b
Edge/IoTgemma2:2bllama3.2:1b
Code generationdeepseek-coderqwen2.5-coder
  • Check licensing: Not all models permit commercial use.
  • Data privacy: Local models keep data on-device. Verify cloud alternatives.
  • Jailbreaks: Larger models can be more vulnerable. See Prompt Injection.
  • Bias: All models exhibit bias. Test thoroughly for critical applications.

Common Pitfalls

  • Oversized models: Running a 70B model on 8GB VRAM causes out-of-memory errors. Quantize or downsize.
  • Wrong quantization: Q4 balances quality and size well. Q2 loses significant quality. See Quantization.
  • Base instead of Instruct: Base models don’t follow instructions. Always use Instruct for chat.
  • Missing tool calling: Not every model supports tool calling. For agents, choose llama3.1 or qwen2.5.

Further Reading

Key Takeaways:

  • llama3.1:8b is the best all-around model for local AI.
  • mistral-nemo offers the best German support.
  • qwen2.5:14b excels at multilingual work and tool calling.
  • deepseek-r1 leads for reasoning tasks.
  • gemma2:2b is best for edge deployments.
  • For agents, always pick models with tool-calling support.

FAQ

Which text model should I choose?

Use llama3.1:8b for most workloads. Pick mistral-nemo for better German. Choose qwen2.5:14b for multilingual support and tool calling. Use deepseek-r1 for reasoning tasks.

Which model is best for German?

mistral-nemo and qwen2.5 are strongest for German. Llama 3.1 is solid but not exceptional. DeepSeek leans toward English and Chinese.

How much VRAM do I need?

An 8B model in Q4 requires roughly 5-6 GB. A 14B Q4 needs 8-10 GB. A 70B Q4 needs around 40 GB. Use the VRAM calculator for exact estimates.

Which model supports tool calling?

Llama 3.1, Qwen 2.5, and Mistral Nemo all support tool calling. This is essential for AI agents and automated workflows.

Instruct or Base?

Always pick Instruct for chat and assistants. Base models are for fine-tuning, not direct inference.

What context length do I need?

Llama 3.1, Qwen 2.5, and Mistral Nemo all support 128K context. For long documents, aim for at least 32K, ideally 128K.

Which quantization level?

Use Q4_K_M for a good balance between quality and file size. Choose Q5_K_M for slightly better quality. Use Q6_K for near-original fidelity. Avoid Q2.

Can I run multiple models at once?

Yes, Ollama can load multiple models simultaneously if VRAM permits. This lets you deploy different models for different tasks.

Sources and Further Resources

Back to Blog
Share:

Related Posts