Text Models Compared
What This Article Covers
- A practical comparison of the leading local text models.
- Strengths and weaknesses of Llama, Mistral, Qwen, Gemma, and DeepSeek.
- Which model fits which use case.
- Hardware requirements and inference speed.
- How to choose the right model for your needs.
Introduction: Text Models Explained
Text models are the workhorses of local AI. They generate text, answer questions, summarize, and translate. But they’re not all the same: some excel at German, others at code, and some at reasoning. This comparison helps you pick the right one.
Why Compare Text Models?
Dozens of text models exist. Without a clear comparison, you might pick one that’s slow, poor at German, or too large for your hardware. This article shows which model works best for each task.
Text Models at a Glance
The top models for local deployment: Llama 3.1/3.2 (Meta), Mistral (Mistral AI), Qwen 2.5 (Alibaba), Gemma 2 (Google), and DeepSeek. All run locally via Ollama. They differ in language quality, speed, tool calling, context length, and licensing.
The key principle: not the “best” model overall, but the best for your specific task.
Who Should Read This?
- Beginners choosing their first model.
- Intermediate users optimizing for specific tasks.
- Developers who need tool calling.
- Multilingual users working with German.
Key Concepts
- Ollama - Model server. Use it to run models.
- Quantization - Model compression. Use it to reduce VRAM.
- Context Length - Maximum text length. Use it for long documents.
- Function Calling - Tool use. Use it for agents.
- Instruct - Instruction-tuned. Use it for chat and assistants.
- Base - Untuned. Use it for fine-tuning.
The Big Five Compared
| Model | Creator | Sizes | Strength | Weakness | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1/3.2 | Meta | 1B-405B | Versatile, excellent tool calling | German is good, not top-tier | General purpose, agents |
| Mistral | Mistral AI | 7B-123B | Efficient, strong German | Limited tool calling | Chat, efficient workloads |
| Qwen 2.5 | Alibaba | 0.5B-72B | Multilingual, great tool calling | Less well-known | Multilingual, coding |
| Gemma 2 | 2B-27B | Efficient, safe | Smaller model range | Simple tasks, edge devices | |
| DeepSeek | DeepSeek | 1.5B-236B | Reasoning, coding | Complex licensing | Math, programming |
Detailed Breakdown
1. Llama 3.1 / 3.2 (Meta)
Strengths:
- Best all-around model for local deployment
- Excellent tool calling (critical for agents)
- Large community with many fine-tuned variants
- Llama 3.2: Compact models (1B, 3B) for edge devices
Weaknesses:
- German quality is good but not exceptional
- Larger versions demand significant VRAM
Recommendation: Use llama3.1:8b for most applications.
2. Mistral (Mistral AI)
Strengths:
- Very efficient (fast with minimal VRAM)
- Strong German output
- Mistral Nemo: robust 12B model
Weaknesses:
- Tool calling less mature than Llama
- Fewer model options
Recommendation: Use mistral-nemo for chat and German text.
3. Qwen 2.5 (Alibaba)
Strengths:
- Excellent multilingual support including German
- Strong tool calling capabilities
- Qwen 2.5-Coder: top-tier for programming
Weaknesses:
- Less well-known, smaller community
- Alibaba model (potential privacy concerns)
Recommendation: Use qwen2.5:14b for multilingual applications.
4. Gemma 2 (Google)
Strengths:
- Very efficient (small, fast)
- Good safety properties (resistant to jailbreaks)
- 2B model suitable for edge and IoT
Weaknesses:
- Smaller models have fewer capabilities
- Fewer fine-tuned variants available
Recommendation: Use gemma2:2b for simple tasks, gemma2:9b for more complex work.
5. DeepSeek (DeepSeek)
Strengths:
- Excellent for reasoning and math
- DeepSeek-Coder: exceptional for programming
- DeepSeek-R1: reasoning comparable to o1
Weaknesses:
- Complex licensing model
- Chinese model (privacy considerations apply)
Recommendation: Use deepseek-r1 for reasoning, deepseek-coder for code.
Model Size Comparison
| Size | VRAM (Q4) | Speed | Quality | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-3B | 2-3 GB | Very fast | Basic | Edge, IoT, rapid testing |
| 7-9B | 5-6 GB | Fast | Good | Standard applications |
| 12-14B | 8-10 GB | Moderate | Very good | Quality-focused work |
| 30-70B | 20-40 GB | Slow | Excellent | Professional workloads |
| 100B+ | 60+ GB | Very slow | Maximum | Server-only deployments |
German Language Quality
| Model | German | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Mistral | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Excellent, European focus |
| Qwen 2.5 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Excellent, strong multilingual |
| Llama 3.1 | ⭐⭐⭐ | Good, not exceptional |
| Gemma 2 | ⭐⭐⭐ | Adequate |
| DeepSeek | ⭐⭐ | Leans toward English/Chinese |
Tool Calling Capability
| Model | Tool Calling | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.1 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best-in-class tool calling |
| Qwen 2.5 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Very strong |
| Mistral | ⭐⭐⭐ | Good |
| Gemma 2 | ⭐⭐ | Limited |
| DeepSeek | ⭐⭐⭐ | Good for reasoning |
Model Selection by Use Case
| Use Case | Recommended | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| General-purpose chat | llama3.1:8b | mistral-nemo |
| German text | mistral-nemo | qwen2.5:14b |
| Agents/tools | llama3.1:8b | qwen2.5:14b |
| Multilingual | qwen2.5:14b | mistral-nemo |
| Reasoning | deepseek-r1 | qwen2.5:32b |
| Edge/IoT | gemma2:2b | llama3.2:1b |
| Code generation | deepseek-coder | qwen2.5-coder |
Security and Legal Considerations
- Check licensing: Not all models permit commercial use.
- Data privacy: Local models keep data on-device. Verify cloud alternatives.
- Jailbreaks: Larger models can be more vulnerable. See Prompt Injection.
- Bias: All models exhibit bias. Test thoroughly for critical applications.
Common Pitfalls
- Oversized models: Running a 70B model on 8GB VRAM causes out-of-memory errors. Quantize or downsize.
- Wrong quantization: Q4 balances quality and size well. Q2 loses significant quality. See Quantization.
- Base instead of Instruct: Base models don’t follow instructions. Always use Instruct for chat.
- Missing tool calling: Not every model supports tool calling. For agents, choose llama3.1 or qwen2.5.
Further Reading
- Ollama - Run models locally.
- Model Gallery - All available Ollama models.
- Model Recommendations - Curated suggestions.
- Quantization - Model compression explained.
- VRAM Calculator - Estimate memory requirements.
- Coding Models - Specialized for code.
- Reasoning Models - For complex reasoning.
Key Takeaways:
llama3.1:8bis the best all-around model for local AI.mistral-nemooffers the best German support.qwen2.5:14bexcels at multilingual work and tool calling.deepseek-r1leads for reasoning tasks.gemma2:2bis best for edge deployments.- For agents, always pick models with tool-calling support.
FAQ
Which text model should I choose?
llama3.1:8b for most workloads. Pick mistral-nemo for better German. Choose qwen2.5:14b for multilingual support and tool calling. Use deepseek-r1 for reasoning tasks.Which model is best for German?
mistral-nemo and qwen2.5 are strongest for German. Llama 3.1 is solid but not exceptional. DeepSeek leans toward English and Chinese.How much VRAM do I need?
Which model supports tool calling?
Instruct or Base?
What context length do I need?
Which quantization level?
Can I run multiple models at once?
Sources and Further Resources
- Llama - Meta models.
- Mistral - Mistral models.
- Qwen - Alibaba models.
- Gemma - Google models.
- Ollama Library - Available models.


